Untitled Document
www.expresspharmaonline.com FORTNIGHTLY INSIGHT FOR PHARMA PROFESSIONALS
1-15 March 2006  
Untitled Document
Sections

Market
Management
Research
Pharma Life

Services
Subscribe/Renew
Archives
Contact Us
Events
Pharma Excellence Awards
Network Sites
Express Computer
Network Magazine India
Express Hospitality
Express TravelWorld
feBusiness Traveller
Exp. Healthcare Mgmt.
Express Textile
Group Sites
ExpressIndia
Indian Express
Financial Express

Partner Assns.
Home - Pharma Life - Article

Unifying corporate mismatches

Conflicts in an organisation are inevitable. To manage and curb them to a minimum is an art. Sushmi Dey gives an overview of the various conflict management techniques adopted by companies

Stress, peer pressure, personality issues, jealousy, miscommunication and strong opinions are the various reasons why onflicts erupt in workplaces. People working together and in close proximity with each other are bound to face all kinds of antagonistic interactions and incompatible objectives.

Conflicts can blow out of proportion and result in loss of energy, morale of employees, deteriorated relationships, loss of motivation, wastage of time, and degradation of performance. If not handled properly, and in time, they can prove very harmful to the concerned employees, their colleagues, and the organisation. It is essential for HR departments, therefore, to identify conflicts when they are still in the nascent stages.

Its healthy!

Ironically, some amount of conflicts in the work environment can prove to be healthy, creative, and in the interest of the company as long as they are resolved in time. Healthy conflict can lead to growth and innovation. According to J P Singh, Director, Bausch & Lomb India, “Since these are healthy debates, everyone is left committed and motivated. An issue is treated like an opportunity to get performance into the next orbit.” Agrees Hari Abburi, Head, Human Resource India & South East Asia, Baxter India, “Conflicts, to some extent, are a good sign that shows ability of the organisation to keep pushing itself to better practices. But if they step out of boundaries of a healthy debate, it does have a negative impact.” Hence, HR departments should restrain from avoiding conflicts totally. They should take them into their stride and steer them to the right direction.

However, professionals say that preventing or avoiding conflict is not a sound strategy. “Prevention is based on the assumption that all conflicts are necessarily bad,” says Abburi. If the conflicting agents withdraw from the conflict and prefer to suppress it rather than confront it, the scenario worsens. At a later stage, the conflict may explode and cause serious problems within the organisation. Thus, instead of suppressing a conflict, if it is managed effectively, it can stimulate creativity and action on a project. Abburi opines,” Constructive conflict leads to accelerate results.”

Catch the cause

The first step to conflict management is getting to the root of the problem. There are varied sources or causes behind every conflict that takes place in any organisation. Typical examples would be misunderstandings and ego problems.

People in an organisation come from different cultural backgrounds, with different ambitions, political or religious views and different styles, forming a diverse community within the organisation. This diversity can lead to misunderstandings, which in turn, cause severe disagreements and subsequently, conflicts.

Ego is another common cause for conflicts. “The 'I am right' syndrome is the most common cause for conflict,” observes Nandakumar Chodankar, CEO and MD of Sekhsaria Chemicals. He says that in such cases the management should lend a patient ear to both the parties and resolve the conflict as soon as possible, so that it does not become so serious that co-operation becomes impossible.

Every employee is under the pressure to perform. While the urge to perform the best, creates a competitive atmosphere in favour of the organisation, there are also times when competition becomes unfriendly or bitter, which can lead to destructive conflicts. Thus, the management has to keep a watchful eye and see to it that the competitive atmosphere doesn't wield its negative band over its employees.

Keeping it down

Experts identify four conflict management strategies—collaboration, competition, accommodation and avoidance. According to Stephen P Robbins, these steps should be followed as 'dimensions of conflict-handling intentions'.

Collaboration is considered to be one of the best strategies, especially when the company's interests are at stake. The strategy is generally used when the organisation feels that the concerns are important. “We have very few conflicts in our organisation because we believe in creating a win-win situation, where we keep our employees happy because it is in the interest of our company,” explains Alok Seth of Samrudh Pharmaceuticals.

Awareness of the various developmental stages of a conflict is essential to handle the same. Being alert to signs of conflicts, helps leaders and members of any organisation. It helps them to be proactive in reducing or resolving the conflict by getting to the root of the issue. Organisational managers can plan their action before the conflict becomes open and destructive.

Communication plays a vital role in resolving conflicts. In fact, failure in communication is often the most common reason that can lead to a conflict between individuals. Conflicts often take serious shapes when people are incompatible or when ideas are not clear in the first place. Chodankar says, “Managers should be more understanding, they should encourage regular discussions rather than ordering all the time”. He further adds that it is important for any organisation to develop relations with its employees in order to understand their needs, requirements, what they are or not capable of doing. “It is important that we talk to our employees in their language.”

Open communication also leads the way to successful conflict management. Organisations require involvement and suggestions from every position to survive the environment of continuous change. “We believe in an open and candid dialogue. People get together in a group to discuss the issues,” said JP Singh, Director, Bausch & Lomb India. Singh further adds that if any conflict arises then the “root causes are looked into and resolved. A healthy debate brings out the best solution to go forward”.

Between The Lines

It is interesting to note that conflicts can happen between various lines of service. There are different forms of conflicts which occur between individuals, groups and departments of an organisation.

Individual Conflict: Individual conflicts relate to Role Conflict which is based on orders that an individual may receive. The individual may also, at times, face two conflicting orders, where it may become difficult for him or her to comply with any one of them. He may, thus, harbour divided loyalties to those initiating the orders, and be reprimanded for the orders not complied with. This type of conflict can happen to both, sub-ordinate and senior.

Interpersonal Conflicts: Interpersonal conflicts occur between individuals or between individuals and groups, when they start believing that their rights are being violated. This, in turn, can lead to higher possibility of aggression in the dispute. Experts say that this is the area from which most Union disputes evolve.

Inter-group Conflicts: It occurs between different departments of the organisation and is considered to be most damaging to performance. Managing inter-group conflicts is essential to any organisation if it has to manage change in the work environment effectively.

Develop Trust

One of the most valued commodities in human relationships is trust. In terms, trust is the key to individuals supporting one another and an essential pre-requisite for open communication. Trust has also been shown to affect how individuals view one another's performance. Trusting groups perceive themselves to have a greater degree of success than non-trusting groups. For these reasons, it is imperative that your company and teams develop an atmosphere of trust.

Trust is earned by one party investing time, effort, and other irrecoverable resources in the relationships. In other words, when companies show that they support the team concept through compensation, training, and resource commitments, teams begin to trust the organisations. Individuals accomplish the same trust building when they offer closely held information, such as key contracts, and are willing to make time to attend meetings to help other members of the team.

Clear common goals are another way to instil trust in teams. When everyone perceives the others, as working towards the same end, friction is reduced and trust is supported. Joint training, role playing, and team exercise are effective techniques for building trust.

By Steve Waterhouse

The Team Selling Solution-Creating and managing teams that win the complex sale.
Republished with permission from Tata McGraw-Hill

editorial@expresspharmaonline.com

 


Untitled Document
Untitled Document
© Copyright 2001: Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited (Mumbai, India). All rights reserved throughout the world. This entire site is compiled in Mumbai by the Business Publications Division (BPD) of the Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Limited. Site managed by BPD.